Sure! Here’s a detailed write-up for SayPro Week 3 (06-15-2025 to 06-21-2025) focusing on the final submission phase:
SayPro Week 3 (June 15 – June 21, 2025)
Final Submission of Project Proposals, Research, Prototypes, and Presentation Videos
The third week of June 2025 marked a critical milestone for all participants in the SayPro Monthly Science and Innovation Competition (SCDR-3). This week was dedicated to the final submission of all essential components required for the competition evaluation.
Key Submission Requirements:
- Project Proposals:
Participants finalized and submitted their detailed project proposals, building on the feedback and skills gained during the previous week’s workshops. These proposals included comprehensive project descriptions, objectives, methodology, timelines, and expected impacts. - Research Documentation:
Supporting research papers, data analyses, and experimental results were submitted to validate the scientific and technical basis of the projects. - Prototypes:
Innovators were required to submit functional prototypes or detailed design models. Where physical prototypes were impractical, digital simulations, CAD models, or other demonstrative media were accepted. - Presentation Videos:
To complement their written and physical submissions, participants prepared and uploaded polished presentation videos. These videos served to showcase the project highlights, explain complex concepts clearly, and demonstrate prototypes in action. The videos also reflected the presentation skills honed during the prior workshops.
Submission Process and Support:
The SayPro Development Competitions Office provided an online submission portal with clear guidelines and technical support to ensure smooth and timely uploads. Participants were reminded of the strict deadline at the end of the week, and last-minute consultation sessions were held to assist with final refinements.
Importance of This Phase
The final submission week was a pivotal moment, consolidating weeks of hard work, creativity, and collaboration. It allowed the competition judges to comprehensively review each entry in preparation for the evaluation and selection of winners.
This structured submission approach not only ensured high standards but also simulated real-world grant and project application processes, preparing participants for future professional challenges.
Would you like me to prepare a reminder notice or checklist for participants to help them with their submissions?
Leave a Reply