SayPro Feedback Forms: After the review process, employees must submit feedback forms to assess the difficulty, relevance, and impact of the tasks.

SayPro Feedback Forms: Post-Review Task Assessment

The SayPro Feedback Form is a critical tool used to gather feedback from participants after they have completed tasks or challenges within the platform. This feedback is essential for improving the quality of the tasks, ensuring they are aligned with organizational goals, and enhancing the user experience. By capturing participant insights on difficulty, relevance, and impact, SayPro can refine future task development, identify areas for improvement, and enhance overall engagement.

Below is a comprehensive breakdown of the SayPro Feedback Form structure, which includes sections for gathering both quantitative and qualitative feedback:

---

1. Participant Information

• Objective: Collect basic information about the participant to contextualize the feedback.
• Description: This section helps identify the participant and links the feedback to the specific individual who provided it. It ensures that feedback can be used for tracking and improvement purposes. Fields to Include:
  • Name (Optional for anonymity)
  • Department/Team
  • Role/Position
  • Date of Task Completion
  • Challenge/Task Name
  • Task ID or Reference Number (if applicable)

---

2. Task Difficulty Rating

• Objective: Evaluate how difficult the participant found the task to complete.
• Description: This section assesses the task’s difficulty level, allowing organizers to determine whether the task was too easy, too challenging, or appropriately balanced. Understanding the difficulty will help optimize future task designs. Feedback Questions:
  • On a scale of 1 to 5, how would you rate the difficulty of this task?
    • 1 = Very Easy
    • 2 = Easy
    • 3 = Moderate
    • 4 = Difficult
    • 5 = Very Difficult
  • Did you encounter any challenges while completing this task? (Yes/No)
    • If Yes, please describe the challenges you faced:
      • (Open-ended response)
  Optional Additional Questions:
  • What aspect of the task did you find most challenging?
    • (Open-ended response)
  • What part of the task did you find easiest?
    • (Open-ended response)

---

3. Task Relevance Rating

• Objective: Assess how relevant the task was to the participant’s role, department, or the overall business objectives.
• Description: This section gathers insights into whether the task had practical value or was aligned with the participant’s job function. It helps ensure that the tasks are meaningful and serve the strategic goals of the organization. Feedback Questions:
  • On a scale of 1 to 5, how relevant was this task to your role or department?
    • 1 = Not Relevant
    • 2 = Slightly Relevant
    • 3 = Moderately Relevant
    • 4 = Very Relevant
    • 5 = Extremely Relevant
  • How did this task contribute to your understanding of your role or the company’s objectives?
    • (Open-ended response)
  Optional Additional Questions:
  • Do you feel this task helped you develop any new skills? (Yes/No)
    • If Yes, please specify:
      • (Open-ended response)
  • Would you recommend this task for others in your team or department? (Yes/No)
    • If No, please explain why:
      • (Open-ended response)

---

4. Task Impact Rating

• Objective: Measure the impact of the task in terms of knowledge gained, skills developed, or changes in perspective.
• Description: This section assesses how well the task has contributed to the participant’s growth and how it might affect their future work performance. This helps the organization determine if tasks are truly helping to build the capabilities of its workforce. Feedback Questions:
  • On a scale of 1 to 5, how impactful was this task in helping you develop relevant skills or knowledge?
    • 1 = No Impact
    • 2 = Little Impact
    • 3 = Moderate Impact
    • 4 = High Impact
    • 5 = Very High Impact
  • How would you apply the knowledge or skills gained from this task to your work?
    • (Open-ended response)
  Optional Additional Questions:
  • Do you feel better prepared to handle similar challenges in the future as a result of this task? (Yes/No)
    • If Yes, please elaborate:
      • (Open-ended response)
  • How has this task influenced your perspective on your work or department’s goals?
    • (Open-ended response)

---

5. Feedback on Task Structure and Clarity

• Objective: Gather feedback on how clear and well-structured the task was, focusing on instructions, guidance, and overall organization.
• Description: This section evaluates how easy it was for participants to understand and follow the task’s structure. Well-organized and clear tasks ensure participants can focus on the content rather than the format or confusion in instructions. Feedback Questions:
  • On a scale of 1 to 5, how clear were the instructions for this task?
    • 1 = Very Unclear
    • 2 = Unclear
    • 3 = Neutral
    • 4 = Clear
    • 5 = Very Clear
  • On a scale of 1 to 5, how well-organized was the structure of the task?
    • 1 = Very Disorganized
    • 2 = Disorganized
    • 3 = Neutral
    • 4 = Organized
    • 5 = Very Organized
  Optional Additional Questions:
  • Were there any areas where you felt the instructions or structure could be improved? (Yes/No)
    • If Yes, please explain:
      • (Open-ended response)
  • Were you provided with enough resources or support to complete the task? (Yes/No)
    • If No, what additional resources or support would have been helpful?
      • (Open-ended response)

---

6. Overall Satisfaction

• Objective: Gather a general sense of the participant’s satisfaction with the task and the overall experience.
• Description: This section provides a space for participants to express their overall opinion of the task, which can be used to improve future task designs and challenge frameworks. Feedback Questions:
  • On a scale of 1 to 5, how satisfied were you with this task?
    • 1 = Very Dissatisfied
    • 2 = Dissatisfied
    • 3 = Neutral
    • 4 = Satisfied
    • 5 = Very Satisfied
  • Would you participate in similar tasks or challenges in the future? (Yes/No)
    • If No, please explain why:
      • (Open-ended response)
  Optional Additional Questions:
  • What did you like most about this task?
    • (Open-ended response)
  • What would you suggest to improve this task?
    • (Open-ended response)

---

7. Suggestions for Improvement

• Objective: Solicit constructive feedback that can guide improvements in future task development.
• Description: This section provides participants an opportunity to suggest enhancements or changes that could improve future tasks or challenges. This valuable feedback helps the organization to refine its task offerings and make them more effective and engaging. Feedback Questions:
  • What improvements or changes would you suggest for this task or challenge?
    • (Open-ended response)
  • Do you have any other comments or suggestions for the SayPro platform?
    • (Open-ended response)

---

8. Participant Rating of the Feedback Form

• Objective: Gather feedback on the feedback process itself, ensuring the form is effective and easy to use.
• Description: This section allows participants to rate the feedback form itself, so any potential areas of improvement can be identified for better usability in future assessments. Feedback Questions:
  • On a scale of 1 to 5, how easy was it to complete this feedback form?
    • 1 = Very Difficult
    • 2 = Difficult
    • 3 = Neutral
    • 4 = Easy
    • 5 = Very Easy
  • Do you have any suggestions for improving the feedback form?
    • (Open-ended response)

---

Conclusion

The SayPro Feedback Form plays a critical role in continuously improving the task development process. By capturing detailed feedback from participants on the difficulty, relevance, impact, and overall satisfaction with the tasks, SayPro can refine its offerings to ensure they align with the needs of the participants and the goals of the organization. Additionally, this feedback provides actionable insights into areas where the platform and tasks can be improved, ensuring an ongoing cycle of optimization for both the users and the company.