SayPro Participant Feedback Form.

SayPro Participant Feedback Form
SayPro Monthly January SCDR-3
SayPro Monthly Final Judging: Competing in Final Rounds with Selected Finalists by SayPro Development Competitions Office under SayPro Development Royalty SCDR

---

Introduction

The SayPro Participant Feedback Form is a key tool used to gather insights and reflections from competitors who have participated in the SayPro Monthly Final Judging. The feedback collected from participants serves multiple purposes, including assessing their overall experience, identifying areas for improvement, and ensuring that future events are organized in a way that best supports the competitors. This feedback is essential for continually enhancing the competition structure, judging process, and participant experience.

The following form is designed to capture both quantitative and qualitative feedback in a structured manner, allowing participants to provide detailed input on various aspects of the event. Their responses will be analyzed and used by the SayPro Development Competitions Office (SDCO) to refine and improve future competitions.

---

Participant Information

1. Participant Name:
   (Please enter your name)
2. Team Name (if applicable):
   (If you participated as part of a team, please provide your team name.)
3. Competition Category:
   (Select the category in which you competed.)
   • Engineering/Technology
   • Business/Entrepreneurship
   • Arts/Design
   • Other (Please specify): ___________
4. Email Address:
   (Optional, for follow-up or further feedback.)

---

Event Experience

5. How would you rate the overall organization of the event?
   (Please rate from 1 to 5, with 1 being “Very Poor” and 5 being “Excellent.”)
   • 1 – Very Poor
   • 2 – Poor
   • 3 – Neutral
   • 4 – Good
   • 5 – Excellent
6. How clear and well-communicated were the event instructions, schedule, and guidelines?
   (Please rate from 1 to 5, with 1 being “Not Clear at All” and 5 being “Very Clear.”)
   • 1 – Not Clear at All
   • 2 – Somewhat Unclear
   • 3 – Neutral
   • 4 – Clear
   • 5 – Very Clear
7. Was the event schedule realistic and manageable?
   • Yes, everything was on time and well-paced.
   • The schedule was a bit tight, but manageable.
   • The schedule was too rushed and difficult to keep up with.
   • No opinion/Not applicable.
8. Did you feel the event provided adequate time for preparation before the final rounds?
   • Yes, I had sufficient time to prepare.
   • The preparation time was adequate, but I could have used a bit more.
   • No, I felt rushed and needed more time to prepare.
   • Not applicable (I did not require preparation time).

---

Preparation and Support

9. How would you rate the pre-event support and resources provided to you (e.g., training sessions, materials, mentors)?
   • 1 – Very Poor
   • 2 – Poor
   • 3 – Neutral
   • 4 – Good
   • 5 – Excellent
10. Were the resources (e.g., materials, tools, access to platforms) provided helpful in your preparation for the final round?
    • Yes, they were very helpful and comprehensive.
    • They were somewhat helpful, but could have been more detailed.
    • They were not helpful, and I struggled with the preparation.
    • Not applicable/Did not use the resources.
11. Were there any challenges you faced in preparing for the final judging round?
    • Yes (Please elaborate below.)
    • No
    If yes, please describe any challenges faced during the preparation:
    (Open-ended text box for response)

---

Judging Process

12. How clear were the judging criteria and expectations?
    • Very unclear – I had no idea what the judges were looking for.
    • Somewhat unclear – I had to guess what the judges would prioritize.
    • Clear – I understood the judging criteria well.
    • Very clear – The expectations were detailed and easy to understand.
13. Do you feel the judging process was fair and transparent?
    • Yes, I believe the judging process was entirely fair.
    • Mostly fair, though there were some areas that seemed unclear.
    • No, I feel there were some biases or inconsistencies in the judging.
    • I am unsure/Not enough information to assess.
14. How would you rate the feedback you received from the judges?
    • 1 – Very Poor (The feedback was unhelpful or non-existent)
    • 2 – Poor (The feedback was vague or not constructive)
    • 3 – Neutral (The feedback was somewhat helpful)
    • 4 – Good (The feedback was mostly useful)
    • 5 – Excellent (The feedback was clear, actionable, and constructive)
15. Did you feel the judging panel adequately understood your work and its significance?
    • Yes, the judges clearly understood my work.
    • They understood it well, though some aspects were misunderstood.
    • No, I don’t think they fully grasped the value of my work.
    • I’m unsure/Not applicable.

---

Competition Experience

16. How would you rate the overall experience of participating in the SayPro Monthly Final Judging?
    • 1 – Very Poor
    • 2 – Poor
    • 3 – Neutral
    • 4 – Good
    • 5 – Excellent
17. What did you enjoy most about the competition?
    (Open-ended text box for response)
18. What aspects of the competition would you suggest improving?
    (Open-ended text box for response)
19. Would you participate in future SayPro competitions?
    • Yes, absolutely!
    • Yes, but with some reservations.
    • Maybe, depending on the changes made to the format.
    • No, I would not participate again.
    • Not sure yet.

---

Suggestions and Final Thoughts

20. Do you have any suggestions for improving the competition’s structure, preparation resources, or event management?
    (Open-ended text box for response)
21. Is there any additional feedback you would like to share about your experience in the competition?
    (Open-ended text box for response)

---

Conclusion

Thank you for taking the time to provide your feedback. Your insights are invaluable and will directly influence the improvement of future SayPro competitions. The SayPro Development Competitions Office (SDCO) is committed to creating a fair, transparent, and engaging environment for all participants, and your feedback will help us achieve that goal. We appreciate your participation and look forward to your continued involvement in future events!

---

This SayPro Participant Feedback Form allows the SayPro Development Competitions Office (SDCO) to gain detailed insights into each competitor’s experience. The feedback collected will be used to refine future iterations of the competition, ensuring a better experience for all involved.