---

SayPro Peer Review Sheet

---

Submission Details

• Title of Submission:
• Author(s):
• Reviewer Name:
• Date of Review:

---

Review Instructions

As a peer reviewer, your role is to provide constructive, objective, and detailed feedback on the submission. Please evaluate each section below according to SayPro’s values of clarity, relevance, inclusivity, and quality. Use specific examples from the text to support your comments. Your feedback will help the author improve the work and assist the editorial team in decision-making.

---

1. Content and Relevance

• Does the submission clearly address SayPro’s themes and mission?
• Is the topic relevant and meaningful to the intended audience?
• Are the main ideas well-developed and supported?

Comments:
(Please provide specific examples and suggestions for improvement.)

---

2. Organization and Structure

• Is the submission logically organized with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion?
• Are paragraphs and sections well-connected with smooth transitions?

Comments:

---

3. Clarity and Style

• Is the writing clear, concise, and easy to understand?
• Is the tone appropriate for SayPro’s audience?
• Are there any issues with grammar, spelling, or punctuation?

Comments:

---

4. Depth of Analysis and Insight

• Does the submission provide critical thinking and insightful perspectives?
• Are arguments well-supported with evidence, examples, or data?

Comments:

---

5. Use of Sources and Citations

• Are sources credible and relevant?
• Are citations correctly formatted according to SayPro guidelines?
• Is there proper acknowledgment of ideas or quotes from others?

Comments:

---

6. Originality and Creativity

• Does the submission offer original ideas or a unique perspective?
• Is the content engaging and thought-provoking?

Comments:

---

7. Adherence to Submission Guidelines

• Does the submission comply with length, formatting, and style requirements?
• Are visuals or media appropriately used and credited (if applicable)?

Comments:

---

8. Impact and Contribution

• How well does the submission contribute to advancing SayPro’s mission and values?
• Does it inspire, educate, or motivate the audience effectively?

Comments:

---

9. Overall Recommendation

(Please select one)

• Accept as is
• Accept with minor revisions
• Revise and resubmit
• Reject

Rationale for recommendation:

---

Additional Reviewer Notes

(Optional: Any further comments, suggestions, or observations.)

---

Reviewer Signature: _________________________
Date: _________________________

---

Notes for Reviewers:

• Be respectful and constructive in your feedback.
• Focus on the work, not the author.
• Highlight strengths as well as areas for improvement.
• Where applicable, suggest specific ways to improve clarity, argumentation, or style.

---