SayPro Peer Review Sheet
SayPro Monthly June SCDR-3
SayPro Quarterly Writing and Journalism Competitions
Facilitated by the SayPro Development Competitions Office
Under the supervision of SayPro Development Royalty
Purpose
The SayPro Peer Review Sheet is a standardized tool designed to guide reviewers in providing structured, constructive, and objective feedback on participant submissions. It aims to uphold SayPro’s commitment to nurturing talent through meaningful evaluation, ensuring fairness and encouraging continuous improvement among competitors.
Instructions for Reviewers
- Review the assigned article thoroughly, focusing on content, clarity, structure, and adherence to competition guidelines.
- Provide honest, respectful, and actionable feedback.
- Use the rating scales and comment sections to support your evaluations.
- Ensure confidentiality and impartiality throughout the review process.
Peer Review Sheet Structure
Participant Information
- Author’s Name:
- Article Title:
- Submission ID: (If applicable)
Reviewer Information
- Reviewer’s Name:
- Date of Review:
Evaluation Criteria
| Criterion | Rating Scale (1–5) | Comments (Strengths & Areas for Improvement) |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Relevance to Theme | 1 (Poor) to 5 (Excellent) | Does the article address the competition theme clearly and effectively? |
| 2. Clarity and Coherence | 1 (Poor) to 5 (Excellent) | Is the writing clear, logical, and easy to follow? |
| 3. Originality and Creativity | 1 (Poor) to 5 (Excellent) | Does the article present unique ideas or perspectives? |
| 4. Depth of Research and Analysis | 1 (Poor) to 5 (Excellent) | Are facts accurate, well-researched, and adequately supported? |
| 5. Language and Style | 1 (Poor) to 5 (Excellent) | Is the language appropriate, engaging, and free from grammatical errors? |
| 6. Structure and Organization | 1 (Poor) to 5 (Excellent) | Is the article well-structured with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion? |
| 7. Use of Quotes and Sources | 1 (Poor) to 5 (Excellent) | Are quotes and sources integrated effectively and properly cited? |
Overall Feedback
- What are the strongest aspects of this submission?
(Provide detailed positive feedback) - What improvements could be made to strengthen this article?
(Provide constructive suggestions)
Final Recommendation
- ☐ Accept for Publication / Competition Advancement
- ☐ Revise and Resubmit
- ☐ Reject
Reviewer’s Signature: ___________________
Date: _______________
Additional Notes
- Please keep feedback focused on the content and quality of the submission.
- Avoid personal comments about the author.
- This sheet will be used to guide editorial decisions and communicate with participants.
This Peer Review Sheet supports SayPro’s mission to foster excellence and professional growth among aspiring journalists and writers within the SayPro community.
Leave a Reply