SayPro Website Development Metrics: Monitor the time taken for each participant to complete their design and ensure that the NPO’s needs are fully addressed

SayPro Website Development Metrics

Objective: Monitor and measure key metrics related to the website design and development process, ensuring that participants complete their projects on time while addressing the NPO’s specific needs.

---

Metrics to Track:

1. Time to Completion
   The total time taken by each participant or team to complete their website design from start to finish.
   • Target: Complete the design within the specified competition period (e.g., 6 weeks).
   • Current Status: [Insert average completion time for participants]
   • Goal: Monitor if participants are on schedule to ensure timely submissions.
2. Design and Development Milestones
   Tracking key milestones in the development process such as wireframes, prototype submission, first draft of the website, and final submission.
   • Target: 80% of participants should submit a working prototype within 3 weeks, and the final design by the end of the competition.
   • Current Progress: [Insert number or percentage of participants meeting milestones]
   • Goal: Ensure that participants are on track and receive feedback early enough to make any necessary revisions.
3. Adherence to NPO’s Needs and Requirements
   Monitoring how well the website design aligns with the specific goals, mission, and features requested by the assigned NPO.
   • Target: 100% of designs should meet the NPO’s core needs, including specific features like donation portals, event calendars, and contact forms.
   • Current Status: [Insert percentage of designs meeting requirements]
   • Goal: Ensure that participants fully understand and address the NPO’s mission and specific website requirements.
4. Design Usability Score
   Evaluating the ease of use of each submitted website, based on factors such as intuitive navigation, readability, and accessibility.
   • Target: Websites should score at least 85% on usability tests, including mobile responsiveness and user flow.
   • Current Status: [Insert average usability score from testers]
   • Goal: Ensure websites are user-friendly and provide an optimal experience across devices.
5. Mobile Responsiveness and Browser Compatibility
   Ensuring that each website functions correctly across different browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, etc.) and on mobile, tablet, and desktop devices.
   • Target: 100% of websites must be mobile responsive and compatible with major browsers.
   • Current Status: [Insert percentage of websites that are mobile responsive and browser-compatible]
   • Goal: Make sure that the websites are accessible to a broad audience, regardless of device or browser.
6. Design Creativity and Visual Appeal
   Assessing the aesthetic qualities of the design, including use of color, layout, typography, and overall visual harmony.
   • Target: Websites should showcase creative and appealing designs that align with the NPO’s branding and mission.
   • Current Status: [Insert evaluation scores from judges or feedback on visual appeal]
   • Goal: Ensure that designs are not only functional but also visually compelling and aligned with the NPO’s mission.
7. Functional Features Implementation
   Monitoring the completion and functionality of key features, such as donation systems, volunteer registration forms, event calendars, and contact forms.
   • Target: 100% of websites should successfully implement the core features requested by the NPO.
   • Current Status: [Insert percentage of participants who have successfully implemented the features]
   • Goal: Make sure that all required functionalities are working properly to meet the NPO’s operational needs.
8. Code Quality and Documentation
   Evaluating the quality of the code used to develop the website, as well as the inclusion of documentation such as user manuals or CMS guides.
   • Target: Websites should feature clean, well-documented code with easy-to-understand instructions for the NPO’s team.
   • Current Status: [Insert percentage of submissions with clean, well-documented code]
   • Goal: Ensure the NPO can maintain and update the website effectively after the competition.
9. Feedback Incorporation
   Tracking how effectively participants incorporate feedback from the NPO and judges during the design and development process.
   • Target: At least 90% of participants should successfully implement feedback in their final submission.
   • Current Status: [Insert percentage of participants who revised designs based on feedback]
   • Goal: Encourage continuous improvement and refinement of designs based on feedback.
10. NPO Satisfaction with Final Product
    Evaluating the level of satisfaction NPOs have with the final website design, including how well it meets their needs and expectations.
    • Target: Achieve a satisfaction rate of 85% or higher from NPOs.
    • Current Status: [Insert satisfaction rate based on post-submission feedback from NPOs]
    • Goal: Ensure that NPOs are happy with the final product and feel that their mission and goals are well represented online.

---

Tracking and Reporting:

• Tracking Tool: Use a project management system to track each participant’s progress, milestones, and final submission.
• Evaluation Frequency: Regularly track and evaluate participant progress at key stages (e.g., halfway through the competition, after prototype submission, and upon final submission).
• Feedback Loop: Encourage participants to submit progress reports and update their designs based on feedback at each stage.

---

Conclusion:

By closely monitoring these website development metrics, SayPro can ensure that participants meet the competition’s goals, deliver high-quality websites that align with the NPOs’ needs, and create an engaging and user-friendly experience for the NPO’s audience.