Certainly! Here’s a detailed explanation and framework for SayPro Workshop Quality, with a focus on the objective: ensuring that 90% of participants rate workshops and activities as “very good” or “excellent” in terms of value and engagement.

---

SayPro Workshop Quality Standard

🎯 Objective:

To maintain a consistently high standard of workshop delivery by ensuring that at least 90% of participants rate SayPro workshops and activities as “very good” or “excellent” in terms of value, engagement, and overall experience.

---

🧩 Key Definitions

• Workshop Value: Refers to the relevance, usefulness, and practical application of the content delivered.
• Workshop Engagement: Refers to the level of interaction, participant involvement, and energy maintained throughout the session.
• Participant Satisfaction Rating: Based on structured post-workshop feedback collected through surveys (digital or paper-based) using a standard 5-point scale:
  1. Poor
  2. Fair
  3. Good
  4. Very Good
  5. Excellent

---

✅ Quality Assurance Components

1. Pre-Workshop Preparation

Action	Description
Facilitator Onboarding	All facilitators must undergo orientation to SayPro’s workshop standards, values, and expectations.
Session Design Review	Workshop outlines, slides, and materials must be submitted for internal quality check at least 2 weeks in advance.
Participant Readiness	Pre-session communication (emails, agendas, expectations) should be sent to participants ahead of the workshop.

---

2. In-Session Standards

Area	Guideline
Time Management	Sessions must start and end on time with clearly defined agendas.
Interactive Methods	At least 50% of session time should include interactive components (e.g., group work, Q&A, role plays).
Inclusivity	Facilitators should create a safe space for all voices—considering gender, language, and disability inclusion.
Materials & Technology	All resources (projectors, slides, breakout tools) must function smoothly to ensure no disruption.

---

3. Post-Workshop Evaluation

Action	Description
Feedback Forms	A standardized survey is distributed immediately after each session, covering content, delivery, engagement, and value.
Rating Scale	Key question: “How would you rate the overall value and engagement of this workshop?” (Scale: Poor to Excellent)
Feedback Review	Responses are analyzed within 3 days to identify strengths and areas for improvement.

---

📊 Monitoring & Measurement

Metric	Target	Tool
Participant Satisfaction Score	≥ 90% rating “Very Good” or “Excellent”	Post-workshop survey platform (e.g., Google Forms, Typeform)
Facilitator Scorecards	Individual ratings compiled per session and per facilitator	Workshop dashboard maintained by SayPro’s Program Team
Net Promoter Score (Optional)	“How likely are you to recommend this workshop?”	Used to supplement satisfaction data

---

🔁 Continuous Improvement Loop

1. Immediate Action: If a session scores below 90%, follow up with facilitators and review specific feedback for corrective actions.
2. Facilitator Coaching: Offer one-on-one coaching or peer feedback if facilitators consistently fall below satisfaction thresholds.
3. Quarterly Review: Compile scores across all events quarterly to evaluate patterns and update content or training methods.
4. Participant Feedback Sessions: Organize occasional focus groups or interviews for in-depth qualitative feedback.

---

📌 Best Practices for Achieving 90%+ Ratings

• Start with a strong icebreaker to build connection early.
• Use real-life case studies or examples relevant to the audience.
• Allow time for open dialogue, questions, and group reflection.
• Always close with a powerful summary, key takeaways, and next steps.
• Show enthusiasm and passion—facilitator energy directly impacts engagement.

---

📁 Documentation and Reporting

Report	Frequency	Audience
Workshop Quality Dashboard	Monthly	Program Managers
Facilitator Performance Report	Quarterly	SayPro HR / Training Lead
Participant Satisfaction Summary	After every major retreat or training cycle	Donors, Stakeholders, Internal Teams

---