SayProApp Courses Partner Invest Corporate Charity Divisions

SayPro Arts, Culture & Heritage

SayPro Email: sayprobiz@gmail.com Call/WhatsApp: + 27 84 313 7407

Tag: Sheet

SayPro is a Global Solutions Provider working with Individuals, Governments, Corporate Businesses, Municipalities, International Institutions. SayPro works across various Industries, Sectors providing wide range of solutions.

Email: info@saypro.online Call/WhatsApp: Use Chat Button 👇

Written by

Daniel Makano

in

  • SayPro Peer Review Sheet

    SayPro Peer Review Sheet

    SayPro Monthly June SCDR-3
    SayPro Quarterly Writing and Journalism Competitions
    Facilitated by the SayPro Development Competitions Office
    Under the supervision of SayPro Development Royalty

    Purpose

    The SayPro Peer Review Sheet is a standardized tool designed to guide reviewers in providing structured, constructive, and objective feedback on participant submissions. It aims to uphold SayPro’s commitment to nurturing talent through meaningful evaluation, ensuring fairness and encouraging continuous improvement among competitors.

    Instructions for Reviewers

    • Review the assigned article thoroughly, focusing on content, clarity, structure, and adherence to competition guidelines.
    • Provide honest, respectful, and actionable feedback.
    • Use the rating scales and comment sections to support your evaluations.
    • Ensure confidentiality and impartiality throughout the review process.

    Peer Review Sheet Structure

    Participant Information

    • Author’s Name:
    • Article Title:
    • Submission ID: (If applicable)

    Reviewer Information

    • Reviewer’s Name:
    • Date of Review:

    Evaluation Criteria

    CriterionRating Scale (1–5)Comments (Strengths & Areas for Improvement)
    1. Relevance to Theme1 (Poor) to 5 (Excellent)Does the article address the competition theme clearly and effectively?
    2. Clarity and Coherence1 (Poor) to 5 (Excellent)Is the writing clear, logical, and easy to follow?
    3. Originality and Creativity1 (Poor) to 5 (Excellent)Does the article present unique ideas or perspectives?
    4. Depth of Research and Analysis1 (Poor) to 5 (Excellent)Are facts accurate, well-researched, and adequately supported?
    5. Language and Style1 (Poor) to 5 (Excellent)Is the language appropriate, engaging, and free from grammatical errors?
    6. Structure and Organization1 (Poor) to 5 (Excellent)Is the article well-structured with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion?
    7. Use of Quotes and Sources1 (Poor) to 5 (Excellent)Are quotes and sources integrated effectively and properly cited?

    Overall Feedback

    • What are the strongest aspects of this submission?
      (Provide detailed positive feedback)
    • What improvements could be made to strengthen this article?
      (Provide constructive suggestions)

    Final Recommendation

    • ☐ Accept for Publication / Competition Advancement
    • ☐ Revise and Resubmit
    • ☐ Reject

    Reviewer’s Signature: ___________________

    Date: _______________

    Additional Notes

    • Please keep feedback focused on the content and quality of the submission.
    • Avoid personal comments about the author.
    • This sheet will be used to guide editorial decisions and communicate with participants.

    This Peer Review Sheet supports SayPro’s mission to foster excellence and professional growth among aspiring journalists and writers within the SayPro community.

  • SayPro Peer Review Sheet

    Here’s a SayPro Peer Review Sheet designed for internal reviewers to provide structured, constructive feedback aligned with SayPro’s values and quality standards.

    SayPro Peer Review Sheet

    Article Title: ___________________________________________

    Author Name(s): _________________________________________

    Reviewer Name: _________________________________________

    Date of Review: _________________________________________

    Evaluation Criteria

    CriteriaExcellent (4)Good (3)Fair (2)Needs Improvement (1)Comments (Strengths / Suggestions)
    Relevance to SayPro Themes
    Originality & Insight
    Clarity & Organization
    Writing Style & Tone
    Grammar, Spelling & Mechanics
    Use of Evidence & Support
    Adherence to Guidelines
    Overall Impact & Engagement

    Additional Reviewer Comments

    (Please provide constructive feedback on content, style, and suggestions for improvement.)

    Recommendation

    • Accept as is
    • Accept with minor revisions
    • Revise and resubmit
    • Reject

    Reviewer Signature: ___________________________
    Date: ___________________________

    Would you like me to help create a digital form version of this review sheet for easier collaboration?

  • SayPro Peer Review Sheet

    SayPro Peer Review Sheet

    Submission Details

    • Title of Submission:
    • Author(s):
    • Reviewer Name:
    • Date of Review:

    Review Instructions

    As a peer reviewer, your role is to provide constructive, objective, and detailed feedback on the submission. Please evaluate each section below according to SayPro’s values of clarity, relevance, inclusivity, and quality. Use specific examples from the text to support your comments. Your feedback will help the author improve the work and assist the editorial team in decision-making.

    1. Content and Relevance

    • Does the submission clearly address SayPro’s themes and mission?
    • Is the topic relevant and meaningful to the intended audience?
    • Are the main ideas well-developed and supported?

    Comments:
    (Please provide specific examples and suggestions for improvement.)

    2. Organization and Structure

    • Is the submission logically organized with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion?
    • Are paragraphs and sections well-connected with smooth transitions?

    Comments:

    3. Clarity and Style

    • Is the writing clear, concise, and easy to understand?
    • Is the tone appropriate for SayPro’s audience?
    • Are there any issues with grammar, spelling, or punctuation?

    Comments:

    4. Depth of Analysis and Insight

    • Does the submission provide critical thinking and insightful perspectives?
    • Are arguments well-supported with evidence, examples, or data?

    Comments:

    5. Use of Sources and Citations

    • Are sources credible and relevant?
    • Are citations correctly formatted according to SayPro guidelines?
    • Is there proper acknowledgment of ideas or quotes from others?

    Comments:

    6. Originality and Creativity

    • Does the submission offer original ideas or a unique perspective?
    • Is the content engaging and thought-provoking?

    Comments:

    7. Adherence to Submission Guidelines

    • Does the submission comply with length, formatting, and style requirements?
    • Are visuals or media appropriately used and credited (if applicable)?

    Comments:

    8. Impact and Contribution

    • How well does the submission contribute to advancing SayPro’s mission and values?
    • Does it inspire, educate, or motivate the audience effectively?

    Comments:

    9. Overall Recommendation

    (Please select one)

    • Accept as is
    • Accept with minor revisions
    • Revise and resubmit
    • Reject

    Rationale for recommendation:

    Additional Reviewer Notes

    (Optional: Any further comments, suggestions, or observations.)

    Reviewer Signature: _________________________
    Date: _________________________

    Notes for Reviewers:

    • Be respectful and constructive in your feedback.
    • Focus on the work, not the author.
    • Highlight strengths as well as areas for improvement.
    • Where applicable, suggest specific ways to improve clarity, argumentation, or style.

  • SayPro Interview Engagement Analytics Sheet

    📊 SayPro Interview Engagement Analytics Sheet

    Interview Title:
    [Chef Name – Interview Date / Series Name]

    Interview Format:
    ☐ Video ☐ Podcast ☐ Livestream ☐ Hybrid

    Published On:
    [Platform(s) – YouTube, Spotify, SayPro Website, etc.]

    Publishing Date:
    [Insert Date]

    🔢 Core Metrics

    MetricDescriptionValue
    Total Views / ListensTotal combined across all platforms[Insert Number]
    Average Watch/Listen TimeDuration user stayed engaged[Insert Time e.g., 7:36]
    Audience Retention Rate% of audience that watched/listened through 75%+[Insert %]
    Likes / ReactionsAcross social platforms[Insert Number]
    Comments / QuestionsPublic and submitted[Insert Number]
    Shares / RepostsTracked reposts and shares[Insert Number]
    Website Click-throughsClicks to SayPro Chef Profile or Program Page[Insert Number]
    Email Opens (if promoted via email)% open rate on related campaign[Insert %]
    Email Click-through Rate% who clicked to the interview[Insert %]
    Engagement RateInteractions ÷ Reach[Insert %]

    🌍 Audience Demographics

    MetricBreakdown
    Top Countries[List e.g., South Africa, Kenya, UK, Philippines]
    Age Groups[List % e.g., 18–24: 35%, 25–34: 45%]
    Gender (if available)[e.g., 55% Female, 40% Male, 5% Unspecified]
    Access Device[e.g., 65% Mobile, 25% Desktop, 10% Tablet]

    🗣️ Audience Feedback (Qualitative)

    • “This chef is such an inspiration to youth!”
    • “Loved the cultural depth of this interview.”
    • “Please do a full episode with regional recipes next!”
    • [Add more as gathered from comment sections, forms, or surveys]

    📌 Platform Breakdown

    PlatformViews/PlaysAvg TimeLikesCommentsShares
    YouTube[###][min:sec][###][###][###]
    SayPro Website[###][min:sec][###][###][###]
    Spotify / Podcast[###][min:sec][###][###][###]
    Facebook / Meta[###][min:sec][###][###][###]
    Instagram / IGTV[###][min:sec][###][###][###]

    🎯 Summary Insights & Recommendations

    Top Performing Segment:

    [e.g., “The chef’s story about reviving a forgotten dish received the most replayed section.”]

    Viewer Behavior:

    [e.g., “Drop-off rate decreased when subtitles were enabled.”]

    Suggested Improvements:

    • Shorter intro segments
    • Include subtitles/captions
    • Promote 24 hours before and after release
    • Add CTA links mid-video

    Report Compiled By: [Your Name]
    Department: [e.g., SayPro Development Competitions Office]
    Date: [Insert Date]

  • SayPro Event Highlight Sheet

    🎉 SayPro Event Highlight Sheet

    Event Title:
    [Insert Official Name of the Event]

    Event Type:
    ☐ Culinary Spotlight ☐ Webinar ☐ Workshop ☐ Competition ☐ Training Session ☐ Other: [Specify]

    Date:
    [Insert Date]

    Location:
    ☐ Virtual ☐ In-Person ☐ Hybrid
    [Specify platform or venue]

    Organized By:
    [SayPro Department / Office / Program]

    📌 Event Summary

    Brief Description:
    [Write a 3–4 sentence summary of the event purpose, target audience, and unique elements.]

    Example:
    The March SayPro Culinary Spotlight showcased five rising chefs from diverse backgrounds, highlighting indigenous cooking methods, Afro-fusion recipes, and cross-cultural food innovation. Hosted virtually, the event attracted culinary professionals, youth trainees, and food enthusiasts across three continents.

    👨‍🍳 Featured Participants / Chefs

    NameCountrySpecialty CuisineSayPro Role
    Chef Amina YusufKenyaSwahili CoastalFinalist, March Competition
    Chef David MokoenaSouth AfricaAfro-fusionSayPro Trainee Alumni
    Chef Lina MoralesPhilippinesPlant-Based FilipinoGuest Speaker
    …………

    🎥 Media Content Produced

    • Full-length video recording
    • Edited highlight reel
    • Chef interviews (No. of interviews: ____)
    • Podcast episode
    • Behind-the-scenes footage/photos
    • Event blog/article
    • Social media content package

    Link(s) to Published Content:

    • YouTube: [Insert Link]
    • SayPro Website: [Insert Link]
    • Podcast/Spotify: [Insert Link]
    • Blog/Newsletter: [Insert Link]

    📊 Key Metrics

    MetricValue
    Total Attendees/Viewers[Insert Number]
    Countries Represented[Insert Number/List]
    Peak Live Attendance[Insert Number]
    Video Views (within 7 days)[Insert Number]
    Social Media Reach[Insert Number]
    Viewer Feedback Submitted[Insert Number]
    Avg. Feedback Rating[e.g., 4.7/5]

    🗣️ Notable Quotes or Moments

    • “SayPro gave me the platform to honor my grandmother’s recipes.” – Chef Amina Yusuf
    • “This was more than a spotlight—it was a celebration of culinary heritage.” – Host Comment
    • [Add 1–2 more compelling quotes or moments]

    ✅ Key Outcomes & Follow-Ups

    • Interviews uploaded to SayPro Culinary Archive
    • Participants invited for future events
    • Feedback analyzed and reported
    • Marketing recap sent to sponsors/partners
    • Social media series scheduled for next month

    Next Steps:
    [Insert brief notes on upcoming actions, interviews, or promotions linked to this event.]

    Prepared By: [Your Full Name]
    Position: [SayPro Department or Role]
    Date of Submission: [Insert Date]

  • SayPro Chef Bio Summary Sheet

    SayPro Chef Bio Summary Sheet

    Chef Name: ___________________________________________
    Date of Birth / Age: ___________________________________
    Region / Country: _____________________________________
    Current Position / Title: _______________________________
    Affiliated Restaurant / Organization: ___________________
    SayPro Program(s) Participated In: _____________________

    1. Culinary Specialization

    (Examples: Afro-fusion, Indigenous Cuisine, Pastry Arts, Sustainable Cooking, Modern Korean, etc.)

    2. Cooking Style & Philosophy

    (Brief description of the chef’s approach, style, and signature techniques)

    3. Career Highlights & Achievements

    4. SayPro Milestones

    (SayPro competitions won, training completed, notable SayPro projects)

    5. Inspirations & Influences

    (Who or what inspires their cooking? Cultural, family, mentors, etc.)

    6. Future Goals & Aspirations

    7. Personal Quote

    (Optional – a memorable or motivational quote from the chef)

    8. Photo

    (Attach or insert professional headshot or action shot)

  • SayPro Submission Review Sheet Template

    Here’s a clear and practical SayPro Submission Review Sheet Template designed for judges to evaluate creative writing competition entries efficiently and fairly:

    SayPro Submission Review Sheet

    Competition: ___________________________
    Entry Title: ___________________________
    Author/Pseudonym: ______________________
    Date Reviewed: _________________________
    Judge Name: ___________________________

    Evaluation Criteria

    CriterionDescriptionScore (1-10)Comments
    Creativity & OriginalityHow unique and imaginative is the piece?
    Relevance to ThemeHow well does the entry address the competition theme?
    Writing QualityGrammar, style, clarity, and flow of writing
    Emotional ImpactAbility to engage and move the reader
    Structure & OrganizationLogical flow, coherence, and pacing

    Additional Notes

    • Strengths of the submission:
    • Areas for improvement:

    Overall Score: ______ / 50

    Recommendation

    • ☐ Accept for shortlist
    • ☐ Recommend for revision (if applicable)
    • ☐ Reject

    Judge’s Signature: _______________________